Too much accessibility?
Digital accessibility (a11y) is usually very stimulating and meaningful. Sometimes even profitable. But it can also be frustrating and expensive. Especially when it comes as an afterthought: When huge checklists with accessibility requirements must be met after everything else is already in place.
When people tell me of such experiences I think of a large lump of butter on a sandwich. All at once is simply too much. Especially if people are telling you to hurry up.
What about "shift left"?
A common recommendation about accessibility is that you should start early. This is not news of course, but definitely part of the solution.
The principle is sometimes called "shift left": Get things done earlier = shift their position to the left on a timeline. For testing, the advantage is obvious: Adjusting early is usually much easier (and cheaper) than adjusting late.
In fact, there are many "shift left" strategies, each promoting some important quality:
- Accessibility-first
- Privacy by design
- Data driven
- Mobile first
- Security from the start
- Content first
- API first
- ...
What happens if we line up all qualities and then left-shift, one by one, from right to left, putting each one first in line?
![Timeline with several people lined up, each with a t-shirt with a theme: A11y, Privacy, Data, Mobile, Security, Content, API](/media/mfbjripb/lineup1b.webp?rmode=max&width=856&quality=85)
We could get a very busy initial phase...
![Timeline with a lot of people representing different qualities – all chaotically gathered at the leftmost end](/media/qprmzlzj/lineup2b.webp?rmode=max&width=856&quality=85)
...or, if everybody is politely accepting when other shifts take place, we will get back to where we started!
Don't get me wrong.
I'm not advocating against early action.
I just want to suggest another analogy.